On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 03:55:34PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> If we experience a refcounting failure in a power domain/well (unref'ing at
>> least one too many times), log the name of the offending domain or well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Both patches look OK to me
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> index 754f9bd..7237dea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
>> @@ -1499,11 +1499,15 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>
>> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
>>
>> - WARN_ON(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]);
>> + WARN(!power_domains->domain_use_count[domain],
>> + "Use count on domain %s is already zero\n",
>> + intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
>> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]--;
>>
>> for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT(domain), power_domains) {
>> - WARN_ON(!power_well->count);
>> + WARN(!power_well->count,
>> + "Use count on power well %s is already zero",
>> + power_well->name);
>>
>> if (!--power_well->count)
>> intel_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
