Op 16-11-15 om 13:35 schreef Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If an atomic update fails intel_crtc->atomic may have have some values left >> from the last atomic check. One example is atomic->wait_for_vblank, >> which results in spurious errors in kms_flip. > Please add the "spurious errors" you see in the commit message, so we > have a better chance at mapping bug reports to fixes. We used to be good > at this, but we seem to have lost the habit lately. > Debian pastebin had an error but the paste expired. :/ Ville do you still have it? _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
