On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That would work for us, but not in the general case (for other > > projects). I was thinking of using some kind of other heuristic, eg. > > (subject, commit message, files touched) with a levenshtein distance on > > text to allow typo correction. > > > > Just for us, we could take a shortcut and make dim do something always > > correct based on the message-id, I'll have a think. > > Do you mean we'd move the patchwork update to client side rather than > server side? We could do it either way, have dim use git-pw to mark the patch as accepted or have the post commit hook look at the brand new tag and infer the id of the patch to close. I'm guessing you'd rather have the second option. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
