Hi, On 6 November 2015 at 14:17, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On pe, 2015-11-06 at 13:53 +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 5 November 2015 at 17:12, Patrik Jakobsson >> <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Ah yes, we carry the mask around there as well. Thanks for catching >> > that. I like the move of POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET into put_domain as >> > well. >> > I will resend the whole series again rebased on Imre's latest >> > series. >> > Ok if I incorporate your changes directly? >> >> Of course! Sending it like that wasn't fishing for attribution, just >> that as I rebased and shifted around a bunch of other changes, >> git-send-email was the most laziness-friendly option. :) Thanks for >> pulling it in. If you're an admin on intel-gfx Patchwork, would you >> mind marking my patch as superseded or something so it doesn't show >> up? >> >> I assume you've co-ordinated with Imre, but he does have a combined >> tree on github.com/ideak/linux#dmc-fixes, which may save you some >> time. > > Well, that one has my patches on top while we agreed with Patrik to > have the opposite order in the end, since I think that makes more sense > for bisectability: Patrik's change to move DC6 enabling earlier might > reveal some issues that are supposed to be fixed in my patchset. Anyway > the end result should be the same so hopefully that branch was useful > for testing. Yeah, having the combined branch in that order was very useful - thanks a lot! I have no useful opinion on which order is better, so whatever you guys decide will be best I'm sure. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
