Re: [PATCH 13/29] drm/i915: Prefix raw register defines with underscore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:20:01PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Most of our register defines follow the convention that if there's a
> need for the raw register offset, that one has an underscore sa a
> prefix. The define (possibly parametrized) without the underscore is
> the one people should normally use, since it will take into account
> all the parameters and other potential offsets that are needed.
> 
> Fix up the few stragglers that don't follow this convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I didn't spot any sneaky changes of values, so
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux