Hi, On 07/10/15 03:35, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
This new subtest will validate a Y-tiled object's tiling mode against its associated fb modifier. Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@xxxxxxxxx> --- tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c index d466e4d..7ca1add 100644 --- a/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c +++ b/tests/kms_addfb_basic.c @@ -373,6 +373,15 @@ static void addfb25_ytile(int fd, int gen) f.handles[0] = gem_bo; } + igt_subtest("addfb25-Y-tiled-X-modifier-mismatch") { + igt_require(gen >= 9); + igt_require_fb_modifiers(fd); + gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_bo, I915_TILING_Y, 1024*4); + + f.modifier[0] = LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED; + igt_assert(drmIoctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2, &f) < 0 && errno == EINVAL); + } + igt_subtest("addfb25-Y-tiled") { igt_require_fb_modifiers(fd);
Wasn't the original WARN triggered by Y tiled object and Y fb modifier? Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx