On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:15:18PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > @@ -1012,35 +1012,16 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> > static uint32_t g4x_aux_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > enum port port)
> > {
> > - switch (port) {
> > - case PORT_B:
> > - return DPB_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > - case PORT_C:
> > - return DPC_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > - case PORT_D:
> > - return DPD_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > - default:
> > - MISSING_CASE(port);
> > - return DPB_AUX_CH_CTL;
> > - }
> > + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL(port);
>
> Together with the previous patch you now lose all MISSING_CASE/BUG/WARN
> for having an out-of-bounds/unsupported port. I kinda liked them.
MISSING_REG() to satisfy the typechecks would be good I think. Or
MISSING_CASE_REG().
-Danie
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
