On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Op 23-09-15 om 11:01 schreef Jani Nikula: >> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Nothing good can come from detaching scalers or updating pipe config >>> when the crtc is already disabled. Touching registers while the crtc >>> and power wells are disabled causes unclaimed register access warnings. >> -fixes maintainer grumble. How am I supposed to decipher from this >> Subject: line and commit message whether this is a real fix to a real >> problem out there, and therefore to be queued for current -rc >> development kernels and possibly cc: stable, or not? >> >> When in doubt, I usually shrug it off, and decide it's for >> drm-intel-next-queued, and therefore SEP. >> > It's for v4.3, so -fixes. Should I explicitly mention it in the commit > message next time? If you have that information, please do. If not in the commit message, then either as a comment after the --- line or in the subject as [PATCH for v4.3] or something. Otherwise you'll be relying on my competence too much. ;) BR, Jani. > > ~Maarten -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
