On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:03:21PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> Store max dotclock into dev_priv structure so we are able
> to filter out the modes that are not supported by our
> platforms.
>
> V2:
> - limit the max dot clock frequency to max CD clock frequency
> for the gen9 and above
> - limit the max dot clock frequency to 90% of the max CD clock
> frequency for the older gens
> - for Cherryview the max dot clock frequency is limited to 95%
> of the max CD clock frequency
> - for gen2 and gen3 the max dot clock limit is set to 90% of the
> 2X max CD clock frequency
>
> V3:
> - max_dotclk variable renamed as max_dotclk_freq in i915_drv.h
> - in intel_compute_max_dotclk() the rounding method changed from
> round up to round down when computing max dotclock
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 55611d8..e1910ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> unsigned int fsb_freq, mem_freq, is_ddr3;
> unsigned int skl_boot_cdclk;
> unsigned int cdclk_freq, max_cdclk_freq;
> + unsigned int max_dotclk_freq;
> unsigned int hpll_freq;
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 21aa745..e8d8860 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5275,6 +5275,20 @@ static void modeset_update_crtc_power_domains(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> modeset_put_power_domains(dev_priv, put_domains[i]);
> }
>
> +static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + int max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq;
> +
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 9)
Sorry, I missed this the last time. The conditiona should
actually be (HSW || BDW || gen >= 9) or something to that effect.
Otherwise looks good, so with that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + return max_cdclk_freq;
> + else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> + return max_cdclk_freq*95/100;
> + else if (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen < 4)
> + return 2*max_cdclk_freq*90/100;
> + else
> + return max_cdclk_freq*90/100;
> +}
> +
> static void intel_update_max_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -5314,8 +5328,13 @@ static void intel_update_max_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq = dev_priv->cdclk_freq;
> }
>
> + dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq = intel_compute_max_dotclk(dev_priv);
> +
> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Max CD clock rate: %d kHz\n",
> dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq);
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Max dotclock rate: %d kHz\n",
> + dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq);
> }
>
> static void intel_update_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
