On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:57:50PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Now that intel_display_suspend is atomic it's safe to remove > wait_for_pending_flips from intel_crtc_disable_noatomic. It > will only be used during hw load or resume, in which case there > will be no pending flips anyway. A WARN_ON(pending_flip) then? (Actually we should start doing DRM_ERROR_ON I guess that would make a lot of complaints go away, and also a lot of genuine bug reports) Or do we have warning coverage elsewhere along the CRTC change path? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
