On 07/06/2015 11:28 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:15:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:12:23AM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: >>> Ensures that the batch buffer is executed by the resource streamer >>> >>> v2: Don't skip 1<<15 for the exec flags (Jani Nikula) >>> v3: Use HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER macro for execbuf validation (Chris Wilson) >>> >>> Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params >>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This no longer applies (unrecognised base). Honestly, I would prefer 4&5 >> squashed together, or 4 after 5 so that we do not declare >> HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER before we accept the RS execbuf. >> >> Minor bit of patch reordering, but the code in 4 looks ok, so >> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for 4/5 > > Yeah I just reordered 5 to go before 4. Series merged to dinq, thanks. > Abdiel can you pls push the corresponding igts (or ask Thomas to do it for > you)? Thank you! I don't have commit rights in igt, but here is the patch: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-June/068799.html -Abdiel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
