On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:15:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:12:23AM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: > > Ensures that the batch buffer is executed by the resource streamer > > > > v2: Don't skip 1<<15 for the exec flags (Jani Nikula) > > v3: Use HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER macro for execbuf validation (Chris Wilson) > > > > Testcase: igt/gem_exec_params > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This no longer applies (unrecognised base). Honestly, I would prefer 4&5 > squashed together, or 4 after 5 so that we do not declare > HAS_RESOURCE_STREAMER before we accept the RS execbuf. > > Minor bit of patch reordering, but the code in 4 looks ok, so > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # for 4/5 Yeah I just reordered 5 to go before 4. Series merged to dinq, thanks. Abdiel can you pls push the corresponding igts (or ask Thomas to do it for you)? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
