Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Buffer translation improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/23/2015 4:42 PM, David Weinehall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
@@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint32_t *DP)
  	} else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
  		signal_levels = hsw_signal_levels(train_set);
  		mask = DDI_BUF_EMP_MASK;
+
+		if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev))
+			skl_set_iboost(intel_dp);

Imo this should be put into hsw_signal_levels and then hsw_signal_levels
be moved into intel_ddi.c - that way everything related to low-level ddi
DP signal level code in intel_ddi.c.

I'm guessing the BXT code should be moved there too
and preferably folded in under HAS_DDI(dev)?
No, it is not required. The Vswing programming for SKL and BXT is completely different. So, better keep it separate.



Kind regards, David
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux