On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:12:41PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:50:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > @@ -3520,6 +3545,9 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint32_t *DP)
> > > } else if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
> > > signal_levels = hsw_signal_levels(train_set);
> > > mask = DDI_BUF_EMP_MASK;
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev))
> > > + skl_set_iboost(intel_dp);
> >
> > Imo this should be put into hsw_signal_levels and then hsw_signal_levels
> > be moved into intel_ddi.c - that way everything related to low-level ddi
> > DP signal level code in intel_ddi.c.
>
> I'm guessing the BXT code should be moved there too
> and preferably folded in under HAS_DDI(dev)?
Yeah that would make sense. And given the long list of vfuncs probably
also time to add a vfunc for this? But that's a bit ouf of scope now,
perhaps a follow-up.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
