We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100 drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite timeouts we automatically fall back to an irq augmented with polling scheme after the first missed interrupt. There's really nothing else we can do, hence tune down the message to informational level. It's still useful for users in case it reliable preceedes a hard system hang. v2: Use NOTICE since it might be of value for bug reports (Chris). Cc: Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index e6bb72dca3ff..5072fb49367e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -2946,8 +2946,8 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(struct work_struct *work) /* Issue a wake-up to catch stuck h/w. */ if (!test_and_set_bit(ring->id, &dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings)) { if (!(dev_priv->gpu_error.test_irq_rings & intel_ring_flag(ring))) - DRM_ERROR("Hangcheck timer elapsed... %s idle\n", - ring->name); + DRM_NOTICE("Hangcheck timer elapsed... %s idle\n", + ring->name); else DRM_INFO("Fake missed irq on %s\n", ring->name); -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx