We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno
updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since
commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite timeouts
we automatically fall back to an irq augmented with polling scheme
after the first missed interrupt. There's really nothing else we can
do, hence tune down the message to informational level. It's still
useful for users in case it reliable preceedes a hard system hang.
Cc: Mark Janes <mark.a.janes@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index e6bb72dca3ff..9350f2e5cd04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -2946,8 +2946,8 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(struct work_struct *work)
/* Issue a wake-up to catch stuck h/w. */
if (!test_and_set_bit(ring->id, &dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings)) {
if (!(dev_priv->gpu_error.test_irq_rings & intel_ring_flag(ring)))
- DRM_ERROR("Hangcheck timer elapsed... %s idle\n",
- ring->name);
+ DRM_INFO("Hangcheck timer elapsed... %s idle\n",
+ ring->name);
else
DRM_INFO("Fake missed irq on %s\n",
ring->name);
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
