On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:39:32PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Fixes a problem having no mouse cursor in the LightDM login-screen >> >> on Ubuntu/precise (see [1]). >> >> >> >> [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-June/068096.html >> >> >> >> Fixes: 7d30ccea214b ("sna: Compilation fixes for stable distros") >> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> src/sna/kgem.c | 3 +-- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/src/sna/kgem.c b/src/sna/kgem.c >> >> index de604b0f3d77..720644b26750 100644 >> >> --- a/src/sna/kgem.c >> >> +++ b/src/sna/kgem.c >> >> @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ search_snoop_cache(struct kgem *kgem, unsigned int num_pages, unsigned flags); >> >> #define LOCAL_I915_PARAM_HAS_WT 27 >> >> #define LOCAL_I915_PARAM_MMAP_VERSION 30 >> >> >> >> -#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BLT (2<<0) >> >> #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_IS_PINNED (1<<10) >> >> #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC (1<<11) >> >> #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT (1<<12) >> >> @@ -1400,7 +1399,7 @@ static bool test_can_blt_y(struct kgem *kgem) >> >> memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf)); >> >> execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)&object; >> >> execbuf.buffer_count = 1; >> >> - execbuf.flags = LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BLT; >> >> + execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_BLT; >> > >> > Again, I am confused. The effect is instead of executing on BLT we ended >> > up on BSD. Which is fine for the purposes of this test and the test did >> > succeed. >> > >> > What's the result of this function after your patch? It should still be >> > true. So I think we are looking at a funky underlying bug here... >> > >> >> How can I test that or check? > > diff --git a/src/sna/kgem.c b/src/sna/kgem.c > index 2058364..66f0087 100644 > --- a/src/sna/kgem.c > +++ b/src/sna/kgem.c > @@ -1753,6 +1753,9 @@ no_context_switch(struct kgem *kgem, int new_mode) > (void)new_mode; > } > > +#undef DBG > +#define DBG(x) ErrorF x > + > void kgem_init(struct kgem *kgem, int fd, struct pci_device *dev, unsigned gen) > { > struct drm_i915_gem_get_aperture aperture; > @@ -2054,6 +2057,9 @@ void kgem_init(struct kgem *kgem, int fd, struct pci_device *dev, unsigned gen) > kgem_init_swizzling(kgem); > } > > +#undef DBG > +#define DBG(x) > + > > Then look for "kgem_init: can blit to Y-tiled surfaces?" > Got some other tuff to do this weekend and really have less time. If it is that important to you, please let me know, then I will test. - sed@ - _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx