On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Fixes a problem having no mouse cursor in the LightDM login-screen > on Ubuntu/precise (see [1]). > > [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-June/068096.html > > Fixes: 7d30ccea214b ("sna: Compilation fixes for stable distros") > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/sna/kgem.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/sna/kgem.c b/src/sna/kgem.c > index de604b0f3d77..720644b26750 100644 > --- a/src/sna/kgem.c > +++ b/src/sna/kgem.c > @@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ search_snoop_cache(struct kgem *kgem, unsigned int num_pages, unsigned flags); > #define LOCAL_I915_PARAM_HAS_WT 27 > #define LOCAL_I915_PARAM_MMAP_VERSION 30 > > -#define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BLT (2<<0) > #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_IS_PINNED (1<<10) > #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC (1<<11) > #define LOCAL_I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT (1<<12) > @@ -1400,7 +1399,7 @@ static bool test_can_blt_y(struct kgem *kgem) > memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf)); > execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)&object; > execbuf.buffer_count = 1; > - execbuf.flags = LOCAL_I915_EXEC_BLT; > + execbuf.flags = I915_EXEC_BLT; Again, I am confused. The effect is instead of executing on BLT we ended up on BSD. Which is fine for the purposes of this test and the test did succeed. What's the result of this function after your patch? It should still be true. So I think we are looking at a funky underlying bug here... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
