-----Original Message----- From: daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx [mailto:daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 4:27 PM To: Morton, Derek J Cc: intel-gfx; Wood, Thomas Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] lib/tests/igt_segfault.c Add unit test to test segfault handling >On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Derek Morton <derek.j.morton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> + * The test consists of three subtests. The first and third should >> + pass >> + * while the second should cause a segfault. >> + * The overall result should be a failure with two subtests passing. >You need to split this up into separate binaries and mark the expected failure with XFAIL_TESTS. Or write a short wrapper for it that checks that we get the right kind of failure ... The aim of the test was to ensure the overall test returns an failure code if a subtest segfaults. I put a passing subtest before and after the one that crashes to test that the crashing subtest does not affect the other subtests. I guess I could write a script to check the individual subtest results. >Yeah, autoconf library tests aren't awesome I know. >-Daniel >-- >Daniel Vetter >Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
