Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Force clean compilation with -Werror"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:57:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:47:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 118182e9d7d5afa0c7c10f568afb46ab78b462e9.
> > > 
> > > It's causing too much trouble when compile-testing for non-i915 folks.
> > 
> > What's the argument against using COMPILE_TEST as a proxy for detecting
> > all(yes|mod)config as in Damien's patch?
> 
> I also thought about random users bisecting who'll then also might trip
> over this. Figure that overall the benefit isn't good enough given the
> trouble this seems to have caused immediately. 0-day is pretty fast at
> screaming around about new compiler warnings anyway, for the cases where I
> miss them.

You haven't fixed the issue of breaking a bisect using allyesconfig
unless you modify history. Either way they need to do a couple of skips.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux