On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:57:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:47:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > This reverts commit 118182e9d7d5afa0c7c10f568afb46ab78b462e9. > > > > It's causing too much trouble when compile-testing for non-i915 folks. > > What's the argument against using COMPILE_TEST as a proxy for detecting > all(yes|mod)config as in Damien's patch? I also thought about random users bisecting who'll then also might trip over this. Figure that overall the benefit isn't good enough given the trouble this seems to have caused immediately. 0-day is pretty fast at screaming around about new compiler warnings anyway, for the cases where I miss them. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
