On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On to, 2015-04-30 at 13:07 +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> Second set of PPS registers have been defined but will be used when VBT
>> provides a selection between the 2 sets of registers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 580f5cb..199a1747 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -6345,6 +6345,12 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_MASK (0x1f)
>> #define PANEL_POWER_CYCLE_DELAY_SHIFT 0
>>
>> +/* BXT PPS changes - 2nd set of PPS registers */
>> +#define BXT_PP_STATUS2 0xc7300
>> +#define BXT_PP_CONTROL2 0xc7304
>> +#define BXT_PP_ON_DELAYS2 0xc7308
>> +#define BXT_PP_OFF_DELAYS2 0xc730c
>> +
>
> Can we add these in the (future) patch which takes them into use?
See my review comment, we should use them off the bat.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> #define PCH_DP_B 0xe4100
>> #define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_CTL 0xe4110
>> #define PCH_DPB_AUX_CH_DATA1 0xe4114
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
