On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > In XenGT, when the mappable aperture size is decreased due to slicing of > the aperture for different guests, it's not about large objects but > small aperture. And that is the reason why the feature was initially > implemented, and they've already been waiting for the feature for quite > a while. Sorry, but the quickest fix for that would have been to add the aperture information to GET_APERTURE, like I have previously said. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
