On 04/01/2015 05:28 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:53:45AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Makes it easier for userspace to start supporting Y tiled display, >>> for at least the legacy format. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >> >> For the record: The point here is that we'll get a user for fb modifiers >> by enabling Y tiling, not enabling Y tiling itself ... On that goal this >> patch falls short, so nacked. > > Seriously? There is an existing client ready to use Y tiling framebuffers. > There are none prepared to use the new api. Wishing will not change the > inertia inherent in userspace. Yeah I'm not sure I understand the objection either... we want to use the new interface exclusively so this patch is nacked? Jesse _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
