On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:38:15PM +0100, Antoine, Peter wrote: > Patch ordering, is deliberate. They are not dependent on each other. > I'll rebase and add the new dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when is > resubmit the patches. Ah, well, huummm. That is something new and innovative for sure. I haven't seen any precedent for this one. I'd rather we always do the same thing to makes tools easier to write on top of the upstream mailing-list centered process, otherwise it'll be painful. For instance is PRTS going to cope? patchwork now sees all the patches as 1/3: http://patchwork.lespiau.name/series/1290/ We could make the tool understand that, but I believe it'll be much easier if we stick to the somewhat established conventions. HTH, -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
