On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:25:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > > index f645268..80253a7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c > > @@ -156,6 +156,14 @@ int drm_unlock(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) > > Also please rebase to latest upstream when submitting patches to the > public (the function is now called drm_legacy_unlock). While we're at it, how did you send those emails to not have the patch ordering in the tags? we should have had 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3 tags there. The usual way is to give the revision of the start of the series (the patch just before what you want to send, ie. git send-email --to=intel-gfx HEAD~3 or git send-email --to=intel-gfx drm-intel/drm-intel-nightly Remember to use --dry-run the first few times if you're not sure. HTH, -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx