Re: [PATCH] tests/gem_exec_lut_handle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:50:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> And I haven't seen a lot of activity to track down the reloc regression
> itself.

The cause was obvious. The essence is the multiple redundant atomic
operations added to execbuffer.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux