On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:19:46AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:19:32AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Reduce default number of repeats a lot. High repeat count is only > > useful for microbenchmarking, not that much for regression testing. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87131 > > This just to hide the regression that exec got a lot slower? Well 10% or so afaik. But in general I think we need to grow more smarts so that microbenchmarks don't chew too much cpu time. Eventually I'd like to integrate them somehow in our performance testing in a new igt mode or something like that ... And I haven't seen a lot of activity to track down the reloc regression itself. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
