On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:48:26PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:54:35AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:09:26PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > > > This fixes a regression from >> > > > >> > > > commit 5ed0bdf21a85d78e04f89f15ccf227562177cbd9 >> > > > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Date: Wed Jul 16 21:05:06 2014 +0000 >> > > > >> > > > drm: i915: Use nsec based interfaces >> > > > >> > > > that made a negative timeout return immediately rather than the >> > > > previously defined behaviour of waiting indefinitely. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >> > > > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > >> > > Do you have the igt for this too? I think an wait while the buffer should >> > > be busy with a negative timeout is all that's needed to exercise this. >> > >> > Done. >> > Testcase: igt/gem_wait >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89494 Pushed to drm-intel-fixes, thanks for the patch and review. BR, Jani. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
