Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make WAIT_IOCTL negative timeouts be indefinite again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:27:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 06:09:26PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > This fixes a regression from
> > 
> > commit 5ed0bdf21a85d78e04f89f15ccf227562177cbd9
> > Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Wed Jul 16 21:05:06 2014 +0000
> > 
> >     drm: i915: Use nsec based interfaces
> > 
> > that made a negative timeout return immediately rather than the
> > previously defined behaviour of waiting indefinitely.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Do you have the igt for this too? I think an wait while the buffer should
> be busy with a negative timeout is all that's needed to exercise this.

Done.
Testcase: igt/gem_wait
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux