On 21/01/15 13:13, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> This goes back to when there was just one global context, when >>> restoring kinda didn't make sense. >>> >>> Also with execlist we already have these semantics, so better to be a >>> bit more consistent. >> >> Where are the benchmark results? The context switch has angered QA >> before... >> > > What if we isolate fds and context by default but then let clients > choose, by using per-context parameter, if they are ok with leftover > state. From other context owned by them, or optionally even from > other clients. > > - Mika And you'd also want to ask them whether they mind /their/ data leaking out into /other/ clients' contexts :-! .Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
