Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> This goes back to when there was just one global context, when >> restoring kinda didn't make sense. >> >> Also with execlist we already have these semantics, so better to be a >> bit more consistent. > > Where are the benchmark results? The context switch has angered QA > before... > What if we isolate fds and context by default but then let clients choose, by using per-context parameter, if they are ok with leftover state. From other context owned by them, or optionally even from other clients. - Mika > Do we even have an igt context switch microbenchmark? > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
