On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:43:40PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We don't currently have cdclk extraction code for 965g,snb,ivb. > Let's assumee 400 MHz until we know better. That seems to match hints > in various vague documents. Whether that's good enough is not > entirely clear. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hm, not sure whether these chips even had outputs which could drive this high really. And if we now start rejecting modes that previously worked (really unlikely imo) we'll get the regression reports and can fudge the numbers some more. So even without more spec hints I'm totally fine with going forward with this. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
