Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] drm/i915: Implement a framework for batch buffer pools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:44:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:22:01PM -0800, bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > +           if (obj && obj->madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED) {
>> > +                   was_purged = true;
>> > +                   list_del(&obj->batch_pool_list);
>> > +                   drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
>> > +                   obj = NULL;
>> > +           }
>>
>> Minor issue: We should move the purged check into the loop so that purge
>> buffer structs get released even when they're too small/big. Otherwise
>> we'll have a good chance to hang onto gobloads of structs forever.
>
> I mentioned that we should do the purge of structs in our oom-notifier
> as well to be safe.

Given that we don't purge the sturcts for userspace purged objects (we
could just clear everything but the idr slot and mark it specially) I
don't think we need this here. At least not until we have this for
userspace bos since there's lots more of those I think.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux