On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 05:06:11PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > +struct skl_pipe_wm {
> > > + struct skl_wm_level wm[8];
> > > + struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;
> > > + uint32_t linetime;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct intel_crtc {
> > > struct drm_crtc base;
> > > enum pipe pipe;
> > > @@ -431,9 +437,11 @@ struct intel_crtc {
> > > bool pch_fifo_underrun_disabled;
> > >
> > > /* per-pipe watermark state */
> > > - struct {
> > > + union {
> >
> > I almost gave my r-b, but then I noticed this. It's going to mess up my
> > pending watermark series. I'm going to add tons of junk here, so union
> > is not really acceptable for me. Needs some other solution.
>
> Well, you could use an anonymous structure in that union? We could also
> try to merge skl_pipe_wm and intel_pipe_wm at a later point? or just
> leaving this a struct, wasting a tiny bit of memory be good enough for
> now?
We only have 3 pipes ... you can waste a few kb and no one will notice at
all ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
