On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:52:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Yet another place that wasn't properly transformed when implementing > SOix. While at it convert the checks to WARN_ON on gen5+ (since we > don't have UMS potentially doing stupid things on those platforms). > And also add the corresponding checks to the put functions (again with > a WARN_ON) for gen5+. > > v2: Drop the WARNINGS in the irq_put functions (including the existing > one for vebox), Chris convinced me that they're not that terribly > useful. > > v3: Don't forget about execlist code. > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Volkin, Bradley D" <bradley.d.volkin@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> With the caveat that in my plan I am going to move the check into the single caller of engine->irq_get(), Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
