On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:08:12AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:02:27AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:52:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > If we believe that the device can cross cache domains in its prefetcher > > > (i.e. we allow neighbouring pages in different domains), we don't supply > > > a color_adjust callback. Use the presence of this callback to better > > > determine when we should be verifying that the GTT space we just > > > used is valid. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I guess this needs some serious beating on vlv/chv? > > This shuts up the warning on byt+ by only running the checker when we > actually insert guard pages. Whether or not we need to add guard pages > on byt+ ppgtt is under scrutiny. Actually it is a bit more than a warning. The sanity checker causes execbuf to fail and the ddx to mark the kernel as broken and insane. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx