On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:12:23PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Oh, wait. It just uses the default-context on each fd, i.e. doesn't > > actually perform the context restores. Will check back later... > > We should throw a ->switch_mm on top of each context switch already to > make sure the pp switch actually happened. So worst we do load the pp on > rcs twicw and we could optimize that away if we just restore the context. I just meant the test is not actually testing my theory that MI_SET_CONTEXT could interfere with the PP_DIR on other engines. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
