On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:31:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Readding intel-gfx since this is interesting for everyone. > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I will attempt to improve my patch submissions process. I also need to start > > annotating version in the subject field as well. > > > > When using --in_reply_to= do I just use the Message-ID: from the original > > patch message header or do I use the Message-ID: from the reply asking for > > the change? > > Usually I reply to the previous patch version to avoid threads nesting > too badly, but other people reply to the last review comment. It > doesn't really matter. I tend to do the latter, but I must admit the threads sometimes get rather messy, so I think I'll change my ways. The changelog in the patch should anyway keep the story together. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
