Readding intel-gfx since this is interesting for everyone. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I will attempt to improve my patch submissions process. I also need to start > annotating version in the subject field as well. > > When using --in_reply_to= do I just use the Message-ID: from the original > patch message header or do I use the Message-ID: from the reply asking for > the change? Usually I reply to the previous patch version to avoid threads nesting too badly, but other people reply to the last review comment. It doesn't really matter. More important is to Cc: all the people (in the commit message to make sure it doesn't get lost, git send-email then takes care of everything) who commented on that patch so that they'll see your updated version. > Sorry for the newbie questions, I'm coming over from the embedded world. Not at all, this just means our documentation isn't good enough yet. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
