Re: [PATCH v2] igt/gem_workarounds: rework igt to test workaround registers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:59:06AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:18:20AM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote:
> > -		igt_assert(fd >= 0);
> > +		if (fd < 0)
> > +			igt_skip_on("No Workaround table available !!\n");
> 
> That's not quite a correct use of the API. The _on is there to signal
> the first argument is an expression. This will work only because the
> string is evaluated to true. You probably want to use igt_skip_on_f()
> 
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/igt/intel-gpu-tools-i-g-t-core.html#igt-skip-on-f

Or just igt_skip_on - we dump the expression that was tested, which should
be fairly informational. At least when fd would have a better name ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux