On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:33:05 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yi, can you get this one run through testing on multiple platforms? We > > just want to make sure there's not some path we missed that's gonna > > spew a warning with this change. > > I think that amount of testing is totally out of balance to keep a > rather tiny warninig alive in the driver load code. The major use for > the pm._irqs_disabled is to catch runtime pm bugs where code uses > changes irq settings while the chip is off. That part will still be > 100% effective with Jesse's patch. > > So I recommended that we instead merge Jesses patch instead of mine > for -fixes. Jesse's patch has my r-b fwiw. Either is fine with me. Maybe you could cc the PRTS and see if it gives you results! -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
