On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add a comment to explain why we care about the current want_panel_vdd > state in intel_dp_aux_ch(). Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index 30943a5..19a818f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -533,6 +533,12 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > bool has_aux_irq = HAS_AUX_IRQ(dev); > bool vdd; > > + /* > + * We will be called with VDD already enabled for dpcd/edid/oui reads. > + * In such cases we want to leave VDD enabled and it's up to upper layers > + * to turn it off. But for eg. i2c-dev access we need to turn it on/off > + * ourselves. > + */ > vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp); > > /* dp aux is extremely sensitive to irq latency, hence request the > -- > 1.8.5.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
