2014-08-12 16:28 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 04:12:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> But we just get/put RPM around this function, not for the whole time >> while the object is pinned. > > Ah misread, saw pin->get, unpin->put and assumed the symmetry. But why > unpin then? It doesn't touch any hardware registers. Only because Daniel asked it on a conversation we had on IRC, and I automatically assumed the patch would be rejected if I didn't include it :) Since both you and VIlle pointed that out, I should probably submit yet another version, without the unpin part, and let Daniel choose which one to merge... > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
