2014-08-12 16:09 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:55:12PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> If we're runtime suspended and try to use the plane interfaces, we >> will get a lot of WARNs saying we did the wrong thing. >> >> We need to get runtime PM references to pin/unpin the objects, and to >> change the fences. The pin/unpin functions are the ideal places for >> this, but intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() doesn't call them, so we also >> have to add get/put calls inside it. There is no problem if we runtime >> suspend right after these functions are finished, because the >> registers written are forwarded to system memory. >> >> Note: for a complete fix of the cursor-dpms test case, we also need >> the patch named "drm/i915: Don't try to enable cursor from setplane >> when crtc is disabled". >> >> v2: - Narrow the put/get calls on intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() (Daniel) >> v3: - Make get/put also surround the fence and unpin calls (Daniel and >> Ville). >> - Merge all the plane changes into a single patch since they're >> the same fix. >> - Add the comment requested by Daniel. >> v4: - Remove spurious whitespace (Ville). >> v5: - Remove intel_crtc_update_cursor() chunk since Ville did an >> equivalent fix in another patch (Ville). >> >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/cursor >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/cursor-dpms >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/legacy-planes-dpms >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes >> Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/universal-planes-dpms >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81645 >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> index a1cf052..2db9e06 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -2149,6 +2149,15 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_device *dev, >> if (need_vtd_wa(dev) && alignment < 256 * 1024) >> alignment = 256 * 1024; >> >> + /* >> + * Global gtt pte registers are special registers which actually forward >> + * writes to a chunk of system memory. Which means that there is no risk >> + * that the register values disappear as soon as we call >> + * intel_runtime_pm_put(), so it is correct to wrap only the >> + * pin/unpin/fence and not more. >> + */ >> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); >> + >> dev_priv->mm.interruptible = false; >> ret = i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(obj, alignment, pipelined); >> if (ret) >> @@ -2166,21 +2175,30 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_device *dev, >> i915_gem_object_pin_fence(obj); >> >> dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true; >> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); >> return 0; >> >> err_unpin: >> i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(obj); >> err_interruptible: >> dev_priv->mm.interruptible = true; >> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); >> return ret; >> } >> >> void intel_unpin_fb_obj(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) >> { >> - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex)); >> + struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev; >> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> + >> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex)); >> + >> + intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); >> >> i915_gem_object_unpin_fence(obj); >> i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(obj); >> + >> + intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); >> } > > framebuffer objects are pinned for a very long time, and the fbcon is > permanently pinned. This should have the effect of disabling rpm > entirely. But we just get/put RPM around this function, not for the whole time while the object is pinned. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx