Re: [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915/bdw: Add a context and an engine pointers to the ringbuffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:04:16PM +0100, Thomas Daniel wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Any given ringbuffer is unequivocally tied to one context and one engine.
> By setting the appropriate pointers to them, the ringbuffer struct holds
> all the infromation you might need to submit a workload for processing,
> Execlists style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        |    2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |    2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |    3 +++
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 0a12b8c..2eb7db6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ int intel_lr_context_deferred_create(struct intel_context *ctx,
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ringbuf->ring = ring;
> +	ringbuf->ctx = ctx;
>  	ringbuf->size = 32 * PAGE_SIZE;
>  	ringbuf->effective_size = ringbuf->size;
>  	ringbuf->head = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 01e9840..279dda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1570,6 +1570,8 @@ static int intel_init_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->active_list);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ring->request_list);
>  	ringbuf->size = 32 * PAGE_SIZE;
> +	ringbuf->ring = ring;
> +	ringbuf->ctx = ring->default_context;

That doesn't make a terribly lot of sense tbh. I fear it's one of these
slight confusions which will take tons of patches to clean up. Why exactly
do we need the ring->ctx pointer?

If we only need this for lrc I want to name it accordingly, to make sure
legacy code doesn't grow stupid ideas. And also we should only initialize
this in the lrc ctx init then.

All patches up to this one merged.
-Daniel

>  	memset(ring->semaphore.sync_seqno, 0, sizeof(ring->semaphore.sync_seqno));
>  
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&ring->irq_queue);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 053d004..be40788 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ struct intel_ringbuffer {
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>  	void __iomem *virtual_start;
>  
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
> +	struct intel_context *ctx;
> +
>  	u32 head;
>  	u32 tail;
>  	int space;
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux