Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: No busy-loop wait_for in the ring init code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 04:07:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Doing a 1s wait (tops) with the cpu is a bit excessive. Tune it down
> like everything else in that code.

1s? Didn't wait_for_atomic() take a timeout in microseconds?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux