On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:00:01PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > I've taken the current rotation test to test the kernel patches and improved it > a bit along the way. It's a bit like a detailed review, but with patches > instead of comments. > > With the rotation kernel patches and an IVB machine, that test now passes. > > Part of the motivation has been to augment the igt_kms framework to deal with > properties. Another reason include the number of lines we need to write for a > test. This series brings down that number from 325 to 129, something I can live > with. Whole series (but one patch after Daniel's comment) pushed to i-g-t after Chris and Daniel ack on IRC. This shouldn't blow up too hard, the test correctly skips when the kernel support is lacking. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
