On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:27:58PM +0100, oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx> > > This is preparatory work for Execlists: we plan to use it later to > allocate our own context objects (since Logical Ring Contexts do > not have the same kind of backing objects). > > No functional changes. > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx> The series looks fine. My gripe is that the split between context and ring is messy (I think that a context is now a view of the entire hardware state and so our bookkeeping should reflect that) and leads to some subtle bugs where the bookkeeping on the ring is not transferred correctly to the context. However, this series is a good starting point to fix the more esoteric problems. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
