On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:59:36PM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: > These look like they're already integrated into -nightly? But for the > record... Oops, I've fumbled my branch management and accidentally pushed this patch to dinq. Thanks anyway for reviewing this to make sure it's correct. -Daniel > > Reviewed-by: Todd Previte <tprevite@xxxxxxxxx> > > -T > > >Dave Airlie <mailto:airlied@xxxxxxxxx> > >Tuesday, June 17, 2014 6:29 PM > >From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > > >For no reason at all the public docs lack them, and Dave needs them > >for his hpd interrupt rework. > > > >Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> > >Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > >Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > >drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++++++ > >1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >index 5122254..5d8ba0c 100644 > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > >@@ -2526,8 +2526,14 @@ enum punit_power_well { > >#define PORTC_HOTPLUG_LIVE_STATUS_VLV (1 << 28) > >#define PORTB_HOTPLUG_LIVE_STATUS_VLV (1 << 29) > >#define PORTD_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS (3 << 21) > >+#define PORTD_HOTPLUG_INT_LONG_PULSE (2 << 21) > >+#define PORTD_HOTPLUG_INT_SHORT_PULSE (1 << 21) > >#define PORTC_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS (3 << 19) > >+#define PORTC_HOTPLUG_INT_LONG_PULSE (2 << 19) > >+#define PORTC_HOTPLUG_INT_SHORT_PULSE (1 << 19) > >#define PORTB_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS (3 << 17) > >+#define PORTB_HOTPLUG_INT_LONG_PULSE (2 << 17) > >+#define PORTB_HOTPLUG_INT_SHORT_PLUSE (1 << 17) > >/* CRT/TV common between gen3+ */ > >#define CRT_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS (1 << 11) > >#define TV_HOTPLUG_INT_STATUS (1 << 10) > >Dave Airlie <mailto:airlied@xxxxxxxxx> > >Tuesday, June 17, 2014 6:29 PM > >Can we get these merged or even looked at?, they are blocking the whole > >MST progress, > >and I don't have any insight to secret Intel review process. :-) > > > >Dave. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Intel-gfx mailing list > >Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Sent with Postbox <http://www.getpostbox.com> > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
